I'm mostly done with my holiday baking. I was sort of low key about it this year, and was also not as into it as usual. I've been cooking/baking a lot, usually with good results, but for some reason my fickle heart was just not into my old favorites, and I was a little careless. The old standbys came out ok but not great. However, the new recipes I tried turned out fabulous.
I did a lot of nuts this year. I decided to do a batch of savory ones for my brother. (Dude, if you're reading this, SURPRISE!) Inspired by a recipe in the New York Times, I prepared some roasted almonds with a ghost chile powder coating. The ghost chile powder is a gift from my brother so I thought I'd return the favor. It contains dried New Mexico chiles, cumin, garlic powder and a hint of ghost chiles. It doesn't seem hot at first but will sneak up on you.
Hot 'n Spicy Almonds
3 cups raw almonds
2 tsp olive oil
salt to taste (I used about 2 tsp kosher salt)
1/2 tsp ghost chile powder (or cayenne)
Heat oven to 350F. In a bowl, mix almonds with olive oil until coated evenly. Add salt and chile powder and mix well. Place nuts on a cookie sheet and roast for about 15-20 minutes, until they smell toasty. Be careful not to breathe in when opening oven since the capsaicin is pretty volatile. Remove from oven and cool.
They have what seems to be a subtle hint of salt and spice, but the heat sneaks up on you. I could've made them a lot hotter for my brother but for a general crowd this is a good heat level. As they said in the NYT article, that little bit of heat keeps you from eating too many. I'll definitely make them again if I have to bring something to a party.
The second new recipe was the browned butter Rice Krispie treats from the Smitten Kitchen cookbook. (You can find a similar recipe here, but the cookbook version doesn't have any added salt.) I made them for the grad students and they were a huge hit. The brown butter and slightly higher coating/cereal ratio made a big difference.
Total Pageviews
random musings of a crazy cat lady
Saturday, December 22, 2012
Sunday, December 16, 2012
Pumpkin Fest Part 1: Pumpkin Yeast Bread
I got this recipe from the King Arthur Flour website. (Bakers - if you haven't checked out the recipes there yet, I highly recommend it. There are a lot of great recipes as well as the option to convert amounts into ounces or grams. Being a chemist, I like to bake by weight rather than volume ;-)) It was easy to make and the dough rose quickly. I just used my stand mixer to knead it and then gave it a few token kneads by hand at the end. For the second rise I put it out in the garage (45F?) overnight and baked it first thing in the morning. It rose a bit too much so the bread may've been a little bit less tender as a result. It was really good. Next time I'll be more careful with the rise, and may try making some of it into dinner rolls as they suggest.
The flavor of the spices and pumpkin came through nicely. It did not taste very sweet. I like the combination of sweet and savory, so I wouldn't hesitate to use this in a sandwich. It also made good French toast this morning, and was a tasty side for my dinner of pork roast, beets and spinach. I think it would be absolutely delicious as dinner rolls with a chicken or turkey dinner.
The flavor of the spices and pumpkin came through nicely. It did not taste very sweet. I like the combination of sweet and savory, so I wouldn't hesitate to use this in a sandwich. It also made good French toast this morning, and was a tasty side for my dinner of pork roast, beets and spinach. I think it would be absolutely delicious as dinner rolls with a chicken or turkey dinner.
1/2 cup warm water
2 packages (2 tablespoons) active dry yeast
2/3 cup warm milk
2 large eggs, beaten
1 1/2 cups puréed pumpkin, either fresh or canned
2 tablespoons vegetable oil
6 1/2 cups (approximately) unbleached all-purpose flour
1/2 cup brown sugar
2 teaspoons salt
1/2 teaspoon ground ginger
1/2 teaspoon ground cardamom
2 packages (2 tablespoons) active dry yeast
2/3 cup warm milk
2 large eggs, beaten
1 1/2 cups puréed pumpkin, either fresh or canned
2 tablespoons vegetable oil
6 1/2 cups (approximately) unbleached all-purpose flour
1/2 cup brown sugar
2 teaspoons salt
1/2 teaspoon ground ginger
1/2 teaspoon ground cardamom
In
a large bowl, stir yeast into water to soften. Add milk, eggs, pumpkin,
oil, 4 cups flour, brown sugar, salt, ginger and cardamom to yeast
mixture. Beat vigorously for 2 minutes.
Gradually add remaining flour, a little at a time, until you have a dough stiff enough to knead. Turn dough out onto a floured surface. Knead, adding flour as necessary, until you have a smooth, elastic dough.
Put dough into an oiled bowl. Turn once to coat entire ball of dough with oil. Cover with a towel and let rise until doubled, about 1 hour.
Turn dough out onto a lightly oiled work surface. Divide dough in half. Shape dough into loaves and place in well-greased 10 x 5-inch pans or, shape half into a loaf, and other half into 12 large dinner rolls. Cover with a towel and let rise until almost doubled, about 45 minutes.
Bake in a preheated 375°F oven. Loaves bake about 30 minutes, rolls about 20. Check the internal temperature of each with an instant-read thermometer; a reading of 190°F means bread or rolls are done.
Immediately remove bread or rolls from pans and cool on a wire rack to prevent crust from becoming soggy. For a shiny crust, brush tops of bread or rolls lightly with vegetable oil. Makes 2 large loaves, or 1 large loaf and 12 dinner rolls.
Gradually add remaining flour, a little at a time, until you have a dough stiff enough to knead. Turn dough out onto a floured surface. Knead, adding flour as necessary, until you have a smooth, elastic dough.
Put dough into an oiled bowl. Turn once to coat entire ball of dough with oil. Cover with a towel and let rise until doubled, about 1 hour.
Turn dough out onto a lightly oiled work surface. Divide dough in half. Shape dough into loaves and place in well-greased 10 x 5-inch pans or, shape half into a loaf, and other half into 12 large dinner rolls. Cover with a towel and let rise until almost doubled, about 45 minutes.
Bake in a preheated 375°F oven. Loaves bake about 30 minutes, rolls about 20. Check the internal temperature of each with an instant-read thermometer; a reading of 190°F means bread or rolls are done.
Immediately remove bread or rolls from pans and cool on a wire rack to prevent crust from becoming soggy. For a shiny crust, brush tops of bread or rolls lightly with vegetable oil. Makes 2 large loaves, or 1 large loaf and 12 dinner rolls.
Sunday, December 2, 2012
Cook's Illustrated Pad See Ew
I have developed a fondness for pad see ew since I moved to Ithaca. It's sort of an iffy dish, but Taste of Thai Express does it pretty well, some of the time, and we order lunch from them every Friday. Much to my delight, Cook's Illustrated published their version of it recently. You can find the recipe here.
While I was looking for the recipe online, I also found a NYT article about CI, and its publisher, Christopher Kimball. It was an interesting read and described the history of the magazine. I recommend it if you're a foodie or a CI fan. I hadn't really thought about it too much since until recently I didn't subscribe to any high brow cooking magazines, but it does point out how CI's precise yet middle-brow approach is quite different from a lot of other cooking magazines. They won't show you food porn pictures of a banquet for 16 people, or even pair recipes for a meal, and, as I've mentioned, it's usually all about the secret technique or ingredient. In all my years cooking recipes from them, I've only had one turn out badly. (Admittedly, I do alter ingredients and cut corners, but I like to think that their recipes are overengineered and can withstand a few tweaks, as long as you don't mess with the secret technique or ingredient.) Although they are often fussy with their tricks or secret ingredients, they don't go over the top with hard to find ingredients. This particular recipe relied on soy sauce, fish sauce,* oyster sauce and brown sugar. Compared to some Thai recipes I've seen, that was pretty minimal. It explained why CI is finally doing more international recipes (answer - readers want them) as well as why they don't call them by their common names, e.g. pad see ew rather than Thai stir fried noodles with chicken and broccolini (answer - even though the readers want them they're not sure the real names will go over well with the readers who are less familiar).
I didn't take pictures this time around. I substituted broccoli for broccolini, and boneless lean pork for chicken. I cut up the broccoli, cut up the pork and gave it a quick soak in a bit of water with baking soda (the CI magic trick worked! The pork was very tender even though it was lean and had previously been frozen), soaked the noodles in hot water, made the sauce, and then commenced with stir frying everything in batches, with a little sauce each time The garlic and pork went in first, followed by three eggs. Then I dumped it into a bowl, stir fried the broccoli with some sauce, and then did the same with the noodles. At the end everything was dumped back into the pan and warmed up.
Anyway, it was really good. I'm not sure how authentic it was - I've had it so many different ways that I don't really know what is normal. The noodles were narrower than the ones used in Thai restaurants, but that is a minor detail. It was still better than most restaurant versions, including Taste of Thai Express on a bad or mediocre day. I liked that there was enough sauce - sometimes there is too little, and the noodles are bland. The only thing I would tweak is to add some of those fermented garlic black beans that I sometimes find in there, and possibly a bit of garlic chile sauce. I will definitely make it again.
* Molly the cat was obsessed with the fish sauce. Now I know what to use if I ever need to give her medicine.
While I was looking for the recipe online, I also found a NYT article about CI, and its publisher, Christopher Kimball. It was an interesting read and described the history of the magazine. I recommend it if you're a foodie or a CI fan. I hadn't really thought about it too much since until recently I didn't subscribe to any high brow cooking magazines, but it does point out how CI's precise yet middle-brow approach is quite different from a lot of other cooking magazines. They won't show you food porn pictures of a banquet for 16 people, or even pair recipes for a meal, and, as I've mentioned, it's usually all about the secret technique or ingredient. In all my years cooking recipes from them, I've only had one turn out badly. (Admittedly, I do alter ingredients and cut corners, but I like to think that their recipes are overengineered and can withstand a few tweaks, as long as you don't mess with the secret technique or ingredient.) Although they are often fussy with their tricks or secret ingredients, they don't go over the top with hard to find ingredients. This particular recipe relied on soy sauce, fish sauce,* oyster sauce and brown sugar. Compared to some Thai recipes I've seen, that was pretty minimal. It explained why CI is finally doing more international recipes (answer - readers want them) as well as why they don't call them by their common names, e.g. pad see ew rather than Thai stir fried noodles with chicken and broccolini (answer - even though the readers want them they're not sure the real names will go over well with the readers who are less familiar).
I didn't take pictures this time around. I substituted broccoli for broccolini, and boneless lean pork for chicken. I cut up the broccoli, cut up the pork and gave it a quick soak in a bit of water with baking soda (the CI magic trick worked! The pork was very tender even though it was lean and had previously been frozen), soaked the noodles in hot water, made the sauce, and then commenced with stir frying everything in batches, with a little sauce each time The garlic and pork went in first, followed by three eggs. Then I dumped it into a bowl, stir fried the broccoli with some sauce, and then did the same with the noodles. At the end everything was dumped back into the pan and warmed up.
Anyway, it was really good. I'm not sure how authentic it was - I've had it so many different ways that I don't really know what is normal. The noodles were narrower than the ones used in Thai restaurants, but that is a minor detail. It was still better than most restaurant versions, including Taste of Thai Express on a bad or mediocre day. I liked that there was enough sauce - sometimes there is too little, and the noodles are bland. The only thing I would tweak is to add some of those fermented garlic black beans that I sometimes find in there, and possibly a bit of garlic chile sauce. I will definitely make it again.
* Molly the cat was obsessed with the fish sauce. Now I know what to use if I ever need to give her medicine.
Tuesday, November 27, 2012
Old Biddy Movie Review plus more: Skyfall
I saw "Skyfall" recently. My movie review will be short, since that's not really my thing. This is the third Bond movie starring Daniel Craig. I was a bit dubious at first, but have since been won over by the newer, darker style, the inclusion of Judy Dench as M, and the fact that these Bond movies are geared a bit more towards women than the older ones. Skyfall continues this tradition. There was more nudity from Bond than from the Bond girls, and there weren't really any Bond girls here. It was darker than the previous two, and dragged on a bit sometimes. Daniel Craig was shirtless quite often. I approve. I was disappointed that they didn't let Javier Bardem be a hot sexy villian and instead made him into a creepy looking one, but I know that is pretty typical. M is the queen of all honey badgers - I want to be her when I grow up. Anyway, I don't think you need to go see it in the theater, but it was enjoyable. I am still holding out hope that Angelina Jolie will be the next 007. She would seriously be the best Bond ever.
But no, the movie review or even the fact that M is a badass honey badger is not really why I'm blogging. No, the real reason that I'm blogging is to do a smackdown of a 50 or 60-something writer (previously accused of sexually harassing a 23 year old coworker) who whined that it's so unfair that Daniel Craig is muscular and sexy, when past middle-aged movie heroes got the hot young babes by means of charm and savoir faire alone. Cry me a river and call the wahhhmbulence - this is the sound of someone who doesn't like it that he has less male privilege than he wants. Gawker and Jezebel already did epic smackdowns of it. I highly recommend checking it out. I shouldn't really have anything more to say, but I do. Is he complaining that men are now held to the same ridiculous standards as women? Is he suggesting that the Bond girls be age- or experience appropriate for Bond, rather than having Denise Richard play a nuclear physicist? Is he bemoaning the fact that in sitcoms and movies it is perfectly common to pair a fat schlubby guy with a supermodel? No. He's just pissing and moaning that James Bond has a nice body now and it's so unfair. Dude, I hate to break it to you, but even in the days when Bond was slightly less ripped, you're no James Bond.
It's been a little while since I did any rants about online dating,* but this just summarized a lot of what annoys me about it nowadays. It's that small subset of middle aged guys who have suddenly gotten more, rather than less, picky and tend to blame women or other men, even fictional ones like James Bond, for their woes. Since I tend not to go for older guys, and they don't go for me either, I was blissfully unaware of this until I hit my 40's and started encountering it in my own age bracket. I can even see it in their profiles sometimes. In person, I get younger guys checking me out all the time, as well as some fairly attractive guys my age and older, but from what I can tell the 40-50 age bracket on OKCupid is full of the pickiest low-libido guys ever. I blame lowered testosterone levels as well as an inability to face reality. My brother has a friend who's sort of like this. I'll call him H. He is my age and is good looking and a total player. He is also very fixated on the really hot young women. A lot of guys who are total players just adjust their expectations somewhat and continue having fun, but not H. Even though he could easily get lots of super hot women in their 30's, he's not having as much success getting the super hot 20-something hotties as he used to, and is not adjusting that well.
Anyway, guys, please get used to the fact that neither you nor the women who will date you are as young and hot as you once were. I know that I am no longer the plump cute Zoe Deschanel lookalike that I used to be**, and that is ok. I don't expect to fuck guys who look like Matt Damon anymore either. But really, it's not all that bad. We bring a lot of experience, humor and maturity to the table. Just because some older guys can attract much younger women doesn't mean that you will. Decide what works best for you, but please don't waste anyone's time with your whining. Life is not TV or movies - you won't get the hot babes just because you have a pulse.
* Mr Cub is still in the picture. I don't know if it will lead to anything, but it is entertaining.
** Sadly, although I did used to have Zoe Deschanel hair, I was born about 10-15 years too soon to fit the adorkable geek girl archtype. I was too far ahead of my time. Geek girls were not popular back then. Of course, my demeanor was/is more like Daria meets honey badger rather than manic pixie geek girl, so that didn't help either.
But no, the movie review or even the fact that M is a badass honey badger is not really why I'm blogging. No, the real reason that I'm blogging is to do a smackdown of a 50 or 60-something writer (previously accused of sexually harassing a 23 year old coworker) who whined that it's so unfair that Daniel Craig is muscular and sexy, when past middle-aged movie heroes got the hot young babes by means of charm and savoir faire alone. Cry me a river and call the wahhhmbulence - this is the sound of someone who doesn't like it that he has less male privilege than he wants. Gawker and Jezebel already did epic smackdowns of it. I highly recommend checking it out. I shouldn't really have anything more to say, but I do. Is he complaining that men are now held to the same ridiculous standards as women? Is he suggesting that the Bond girls be age- or experience appropriate for Bond, rather than having Denise Richard play a nuclear physicist? Is he bemoaning the fact that in sitcoms and movies it is perfectly common to pair a fat schlubby guy with a supermodel? No. He's just pissing and moaning that James Bond has a nice body now and it's so unfair. Dude, I hate to break it to you, but even in the days when Bond was slightly less ripped, you're no James Bond.
It's been a little while since I did any rants about online dating,* but this just summarized a lot of what annoys me about it nowadays. It's that small subset of middle aged guys who have suddenly gotten more, rather than less, picky and tend to blame women or other men, even fictional ones like James Bond, for their woes. Since I tend not to go for older guys, and they don't go for me either, I was blissfully unaware of this until I hit my 40's and started encountering it in my own age bracket. I can even see it in their profiles sometimes. In person, I get younger guys checking me out all the time, as well as some fairly attractive guys my age and older, but from what I can tell the 40-50 age bracket on OKCupid is full of the pickiest low-libido guys ever. I blame lowered testosterone levels as well as an inability to face reality. My brother has a friend who's sort of like this. I'll call him H. He is my age and is good looking and a total player. He is also very fixated on the really hot young women. A lot of guys who are total players just adjust their expectations somewhat and continue having fun, but not H. Even though he could easily get lots of super hot women in their 30's, he's not having as much success getting the super hot 20-something hotties as he used to, and is not adjusting that well.
Anyway, guys, please get used to the fact that neither you nor the women who will date you are as young and hot as you once were. I know that I am no longer the plump cute Zoe Deschanel lookalike that I used to be**, and that is ok. I don't expect to fuck guys who look like Matt Damon anymore either. But really, it's not all that bad. We bring a lot of experience, humor and maturity to the table. Just because some older guys can attract much younger women doesn't mean that you will. Decide what works best for you, but please don't waste anyone's time with your whining. Life is not TV or movies - you won't get the hot babes just because you have a pulse.
* Mr Cub is still in the picture. I don't know if it will lead to anything, but it is entertaining.
** Sadly, although I did used to have Zoe Deschanel hair, I was born about 10-15 years too soon to fit the adorkable geek girl archtype. I was too far ahead of my time. Geek girls were not popular back then. Of course, my demeanor was/is more like Daria meets honey badger rather than manic pixie geek girl, so that didn't help either.
Friday, November 23, 2012
CI November: Triple Chocolate Mousse Cake
I got invited over to a colleague's house for Thanksgiving dinner. I volunteered to bring a dessert, and since the pies were already covered I decided to make the triple chocolate mousse cake from Cook's Illustrated. I've been wanting to make this for a while but never had a good excuse. It's a bit too rich and fancy for an impulse bake, and there's no way I'd trust myself with it with no one to help me eat it.
Fortunately, I'm not the only one blogging the recipes from CI, so I don't have to type everything in, although I've changed the commentary as needed. I've pilfered this one from the aptly named Annie's Eats.
Ingredients:
For the bottom layer:
6 tbsp. unsalted butter, cut into 6 pieces (plus extra for greasing the pan)
7 oz. bittersweet chocolate, finely chopped
¾ tsp. instant espresso powder
1½ tsp. vanilla extract
4 large eggs, separated
Pinch of salt
1/3 cup light brown sugar, packed
For the middle layer:
2 tbsp. cocoa powder, preferably Dutch-processed
5 tbsp. hot water
7 oz. bittersweet chocolate, finely chopped
1½ cups heavy cream
1 tbsp. granulated sugar
Pinch of salt
For the top layer:
¾ tsp. powdered gelatin
1 tbsp. water
6 oz. white chocolate, finely chopped
1½ cups heavy cream
For garnish:
Chocolate curls or cocoa powder
Directions:
To make the bottom layer, butter the bottom and sides of a 9-inch springform pan. Your springform pan should be at least 3" tall. Center a rack in the oven and preheat to 325˚ F. Combine the butter, chocolate, and espresso powder in a large heatproof bowl and microwave carefully until chocolate is almost melted. Stir occasionally until the mixture is smooth. Remove from the heat and let cool slightly, about 5 minutes. Whisk in the vanilla and egg yolks. Set aside.
In a stand mixer fitted with the whisk attachment, beat the egg whites and salt on medium speed until foamy, about 30 seconds. Crumble half of the brown sugar into the mixing bowl with your fingers to remove any lumps. Beat until incorporated, about 15 seconds. Add the remaining brown sugar and continue to beat on high speed until stiff peaks form, about 1 minute more. Using a whisk, mix one-third of the beaten egg whites to the chocolate mixture to lighten it. Fold in the remaining egg whites gently with a rubber spatula until no streaks remain. Pour the batter into the prepared springform pan and smooth the top with a spatula.
Bake until the cake has risen, is firm around the edges and the center has just set but is still soft (should spring back after pressing gently with a finger), about 14-18 minutes. Transfer the cake to a wire rack to cool completely, at least 1 hour. Do not remove the cake from the pan. (If not making the second layer right away, cover with plastic wrap and refrigerate until ready to proceed.)

To make the second layer, whisk together the cocoa powder and hot water in a small bowl; set aside. Melt the chocolate in a heatproof bowl set over simmering water, stirring occasionally until smooth, or microwave it carefully Once melted, remove from the heat and let cool slightly, 2-5 minutes.
In the clean bowl of a stand mixer fitted with the whisk attachment, whip the cream, sugar and salt on medium speed until the mixture begins to thicken, about 30 seconds. Increase the speed to high and whip until soft peaks form when the whisk is lifted, 30-60 seconds. Whisk in the cocoa powder mixture until smooth. Using a whisk, mix one-third of the whipped cream to the chocolate mixture to lighten it. Fold in the remaining whipped cream gently with a rubber spatula until no streaks remain. Pour the mousse into the springform pan over the cooled cake and tap gently on the counter 3 times to remove air bubbles. Gently smooth the top with a spatula. Wipe the inside edge of the pan to remove any drips. Refrigerate for at least 15 minutes while preparing the top layer. I covered it with plastic wrap and put it in the fridge overnight.
To make the top layer, sprinkle the gelatin over the water in a small bowl and let stand at least 5 minutes to soften. Place the white chocolate in a medium bowl. Bring ½ cup of the cream to a boil in a small saucepan. Remove the pan from the heat, add the gelatin mixture and stir until dissolved. Pour the hot cream mixture over the white chocolate and let stand about 1 minute. Whisk until the mixture is smooth. Cool to room temperature, about 5-8 minutes, stirring occasionally.
In the clean bowl of a stand mixer fitted with the whisk attachment, whip the remaining 1 cup of cream at medium speed until it begins to thicken. Increase the speed to high and whip until soft peaks form when the whisk is lifted, 30-60 seconds. Using a whisk, mix one-third of the whipped cream to the white chocolate mixture to lighten it. Fold in the remaining whipped cream gently with a rubber spatula until no streaks remain. Spoon the white chocolate mousse into the pan over the middle layer. Smooth the top with an offset spatula. Return the cake to the refrigerator and chill until set, at least 2½ hours. (Note: Do NOT cover your pan with plastic wrap unless you are completely sure you can do so without it touching the top of your cake during placement or removal. If it does touch the cake, it will smudge the perfectly pristine top, forcing you to make an excessive amount of chocolate curls. I speak from experience.)
OK, old biddy Annie commentary again...The base layer took longer than expected. I left it in there around 20 minutes. I thought it was done in the middle but it started looking gooier as it sunk and cooled. It was somewhat gooey but ok in the final cake. The second and third layers were pretty straightforward. I was out of chocolate so I didn't put any chocolate shavings on top, but it would've looked nice. Some of the commenters suggested using a collar of greased parchment paper around the cake to make look prettier when it is removed from the pan. It did stick a bit, but no one seemed to mind since they were fighting to lick the knife.
It was really rich, but since it was fluffy and not too sweet it was not overwhelming. I'll definitely make it again when I need a showstopper dessert.
Fortunately, I'm not the only one blogging the recipes from CI, so I don't have to type everything in, although I've changed the commentary as needed. I've pilfered this one from the aptly named Annie's Eats.
Ingredients:
For the bottom layer:
6 tbsp. unsalted butter, cut into 6 pieces (plus extra for greasing the pan)
7 oz. bittersweet chocolate, finely chopped
¾ tsp. instant espresso powder
1½ tsp. vanilla extract
4 large eggs, separated
Pinch of salt
1/3 cup light brown sugar, packed
For the middle layer:
2 tbsp. cocoa powder, preferably Dutch-processed
5 tbsp. hot water
7 oz. bittersweet chocolate, finely chopped
1½ cups heavy cream
1 tbsp. granulated sugar
Pinch of salt
For the top layer:
¾ tsp. powdered gelatin
1 tbsp. water
6 oz. white chocolate, finely chopped
1½ cups heavy cream
For garnish:
Chocolate curls or cocoa powder
Directions:
To make the bottom layer, butter the bottom and sides of a 9-inch springform pan. Your springform pan should be at least 3" tall. Center a rack in the oven and preheat to 325˚ F. Combine the butter, chocolate, and espresso powder in a large heatproof bowl and microwave carefully until chocolate is almost melted. Stir occasionally until the mixture is smooth. Remove from the heat and let cool slightly, about 5 minutes. Whisk in the vanilla and egg yolks. Set aside.
In a stand mixer fitted with the whisk attachment, beat the egg whites and salt on medium speed until foamy, about 30 seconds. Crumble half of the brown sugar into the mixing bowl with your fingers to remove any lumps. Beat until incorporated, about 15 seconds. Add the remaining brown sugar and continue to beat on high speed until stiff peaks form, about 1 minute more. Using a whisk, mix one-third of the beaten egg whites to the chocolate mixture to lighten it. Fold in the remaining egg whites gently with a rubber spatula until no streaks remain. Pour the batter into the prepared springform pan and smooth the top with a spatula.
Bake until the cake has risen, is firm around the edges and the center has just set but is still soft (should spring back after pressing gently with a finger), about 14-18 minutes. Transfer the cake to a wire rack to cool completely, at least 1 hour. Do not remove the cake from the pan. (If not making the second layer right away, cover with plastic wrap and refrigerate until ready to proceed.)

To make the second layer, whisk together the cocoa powder and hot water in a small bowl; set aside. Melt the chocolate in a heatproof bowl set over simmering water, stirring occasionally until smooth, or microwave it carefully Once melted, remove from the heat and let cool slightly, 2-5 minutes.
In the clean bowl of a stand mixer fitted with the whisk attachment, whip the cream, sugar and salt on medium speed until the mixture begins to thicken, about 30 seconds. Increase the speed to high and whip until soft peaks form when the whisk is lifted, 30-60 seconds. Whisk in the cocoa powder mixture until smooth. Using a whisk, mix one-third of the whipped cream to the chocolate mixture to lighten it. Fold in the remaining whipped cream gently with a rubber spatula until no streaks remain. Pour the mousse into the springform pan over the cooled cake and tap gently on the counter 3 times to remove air bubbles. Gently smooth the top with a spatula. Wipe the inside edge of the pan to remove any drips. Refrigerate for at least 15 minutes while preparing the top layer. I covered it with plastic wrap and put it in the fridge overnight.
To make the top layer, sprinkle the gelatin over the water in a small bowl and let stand at least 5 minutes to soften. Place the white chocolate in a medium bowl. Bring ½ cup of the cream to a boil in a small saucepan. Remove the pan from the heat, add the gelatin mixture and stir until dissolved. Pour the hot cream mixture over the white chocolate and let stand about 1 minute. Whisk until the mixture is smooth. Cool to room temperature, about 5-8 minutes, stirring occasionally.
In the clean bowl of a stand mixer fitted with the whisk attachment, whip the remaining 1 cup of cream at medium speed until it begins to thicken. Increase the speed to high and whip until soft peaks form when the whisk is lifted, 30-60 seconds. Using a whisk, mix one-third of the whipped cream to the white chocolate mixture to lighten it. Fold in the remaining whipped cream gently with a rubber spatula until no streaks remain. Spoon the white chocolate mousse into the pan over the middle layer. Smooth the top with an offset spatula. Return the cake to the refrigerator and chill until set, at least 2½ hours. (Note: Do NOT cover your pan with plastic wrap unless you are completely sure you can do so without it touching the top of your cake during placement or removal. If it does touch the cake, it will smudge the perfectly pristine top, forcing you to make an excessive amount of chocolate curls. I speak from experience.)
OK, old biddy Annie commentary again...The base layer took longer than expected. I left it in there around 20 minutes. I thought it was done in the middle but it started looking gooier as it sunk and cooled. It was somewhat gooey but ok in the final cake. The second and third layers were pretty straightforward. I was out of chocolate so I didn't put any chocolate shavings on top, but it would've looked nice. Some of the commenters suggested using a collar of greased parchment paper around the cake to make look prettier when it is removed from the pan. It did stick a bit, but no one seemed to mind since they were fighting to lick the knife.It was really rich, but since it was fluffy and not too sweet it was not overwhelming. I'll definitely make it again when I need a showstopper dessert.
Sunday, November 18, 2012
Cook's Illustrated Recipe Testing: Saag Paneer
Saag Paneer
It's November, and as usual I am observing neither No Shave November or National Novel Writing Month, but am instead doing the annual CI recipe testing marathon. Due to unforeseen circumstances, today is the first actual CI recipe in a while. I'll keep it going until the New Year since I've got a backlog of recipes to test from CI, as well as the new Smitten Kitchen cookbook. Today I was on the lookout for something that bears little resemblence to anything normally served at Thanksgiving.
Anyway, there was a recipe for Saag Paneer in a recent issue of CI. Based on my fondness for dairy products and my one-time relationship with Cowdude, I think it's probably a safe guess to say that I was a cow in a past life. I love saag paneer. Veggies, spices, cream, and cheese - what's not to like!?!? I've never made it at home, although I have bought paneer and eaten it all by itself.
Anyway, CI doesn't usually do anything half-assed, so they had a recipe to make the cheese as well. I've made ricotta, yogurt, and kefir, but have never made paneer. Fortunately for me, other bloggers have blogged about it already so I can cut and paste the recipe. There are a lot of pictures and amusing commentary so I recommend checking it out
Anyway, bring your milk to a simmer and stir in the buttermilk and salt. Then let it sit for a few minutes. Pour that through your cheesecloth lined colander and let it drain for about fifteen minutes. Squeeze out the excess liquid and place the cheesecloth-wrapped ball on a plate. Place another plate on top and set something heavy on top. (I used a dutch oven) Let it sit for 45 minutes. It will firm up and drain off more liquid during this time. Remove the cheesecloth and cut the cheese into cubes. Allow to air dry while you are making the sauce.
You could use all spinach, but CI recommended using turnip greens which gave it a more peppery flavor.
Basically just rinse all your greens and then chop off any large stems. Add them to a large bowl and microwave them on high for 3-4 minutes until they are wilted and tender. You will have to work in batches.
Chop up enough spinach and greens to equal 1/3 cup of each and set it aside. Then add the rest of the greens to a blender
Meanwhile, melt butter in a large skillet. Then add your ground spices, diced onion, and a pinch of salt and cook until the onion is soft. Add the ginger, garlic, jalapeno and cook another minute.
Then add in your canned tomatoes and let that all cook together for a few minutes. Add half of the mixture to the blender along with the water and cashews. Puree it and return it to the pan. add chopped greens and buttermilk to pan, and add additional salt if needed. Bring to a simmer and cook minutes. Then just gently fold in the cheese and cook it for another minute or two so everything is warm. Be gentle with the cheese or it will just crumble into super-tiny pieces. Serve with rice.
Anyway, this recipe is steppy and I got an awful lot of dishes dirty, even though I was using stuff multiple times. It came out really well - I loved the pepperiness that the turnip greens imparted, and appreciated that it was lighter and healthier than the usual restaurant version. The taste was pretty similar, even though I forgot a few ingredients Next time I will just buy the cheese, make it in advance, or use tofu. But overall it was a winner and I will make it again.
It's November, and as usual I am observing neither No Shave November or National Novel Writing Month, but am instead doing the annual CI recipe testing marathon. Due to unforeseen circumstances, today is the first actual CI recipe in a while. I'll keep it going until the New Year since I've got a backlog of recipes to test from CI, as well as the new Smitten Kitchen cookbook. Today I was on the lookout for something that bears little resemblence to anything normally served at Thanksgiving.
Anyway, there was a recipe for Saag Paneer in a recent issue of CI. Based on my fondness for dairy products and my one-time relationship with Cowdude, I think it's probably a safe guess to say that I was a cow in a past life. I love saag paneer. Veggies, spices, cream, and cheese - what's not to like!?!? I've never made it at home, although I have bought paneer and eaten it all by itself.
Anyway, CI doesn't usually do anything half-assed, so they had a recipe to make the cheese as well. I've made ricotta, yogurt, and kefir, but have never made paneer. Fortunately for me, other bloggers have blogged about it already so I can cut and paste the recipe. There are a lot of pictures and amusing commentary so I recommend checking it out
Homemade Saag Paneer
Yield: Serves 4-6
Prep Time: 1 hour
Total Time: 1 hour 30 minutes
Ingredients:
Cheese:
3 quarts whole milk
3 cups buttermilk
2 teaspoons salt
Spinach Sauce:
1container baby spinach (11 ounces) spinach, washed
1 large bunch turnip or mustard greens, washed
3 tablespoons butter
1 teaspoon cumin seeds
1 teaspoon coriander
1 teaspoon paprika
1/2 teaspoon cardamon
1/4 teaspoon cinnamon
1 onion, diced
3 cloves garlic, minced
2 inches fresh ginger, minced
1 jalapeno chile, diced
1 (14.5 ounce can) diced tomatoes
1/4 cup peanuts or cashews
1 cup water
1 cup buttermilk
Fresh cilantro (garnish)
Cashews (garnish)
Rice, for serving
Helpful Equipment:
Blender
Cheese cloth
3 quarts whole milk
3 cups buttermilk
2 teaspoons salt
Spinach Sauce:
1container baby spinach (11 ounces) spinach, washed
1 large bunch turnip or mustard greens, washed
3 tablespoons butter
1 teaspoon cumin seeds
1 teaspoon coriander
1 teaspoon paprika
1/2 teaspoon cardamon
1/4 teaspoon cinnamon
1 onion, diced
3 cloves garlic, minced
2 inches fresh ginger, minced
1 jalapeno chile, diced
1 (14.5 ounce can) diced tomatoes
1/4 cup peanuts or cashews
1 cup water
1 cup buttermilk
Fresh cilantro (garnish)
Cashews (garnish)
Rice, for serving
Helpful Equipment:
Blender
Cheese cloth
Adapted from a Cook's Illustrated recipe.
Making Cheese
My only advice, if you decide to make this, is to make sure you use a very large colander and have enough cheesecloth. Mine was overflowing and got clogged. I got out a sieve and used that once the curds had started to stick together, I probably lost a lot this way, though.Anyway, bring your milk to a simmer and stir in the buttermilk and salt. Then let it sit for a few minutes. Pour that through your cheesecloth lined colander and let it drain for about fifteen minutes. Squeeze out the excess liquid and place the cheesecloth-wrapped ball on a plate. Place another plate on top and set something heavy on top. (I used a dutch oven) Let it sit for 45 minutes. It will firm up and drain off more liquid during this time. Remove the cheesecloth and cut the cheese into cubes. Allow to air dry while you are making the sauce.
The Spinach Sauce
While the cheese part has a few ingredients but is maybe a bit
intimidating, the spinach sauce has a bunch of ingredients but is really
simple to make.You could use all spinach, but CI recommended using turnip greens which gave it a more peppery flavor.
Basically just rinse all your greens and then chop off any large stems. Add them to a large bowl and microwave them on high for 3-4 minutes until they are wilted and tender. You will have to work in batches.
Chop up enough spinach and greens to equal 1/3 cup of each and set it aside. Then add the rest of the greens to a blender
Meanwhile, melt butter in a large skillet. Then add your ground spices, diced onion, and a pinch of salt and cook until the onion is soft. Add the ginger, garlic, jalapeno and cook another minute.
Then add in your canned tomatoes and let that all cook together for a few minutes. Add half of the mixture to the blender along with the water and cashews. Puree it and return it to the pan. add chopped greens and buttermilk to pan, and add additional salt if needed. Bring to a simmer and cook minutes. Then just gently fold in the cheese and cook it for another minute or two so everything is warm. Be gentle with the cheese or it will just crumble into super-tiny pieces. Serve with rice.
Anyway, this recipe is steppy and I got an awful lot of dishes dirty, even though I was using stuff multiple times. It came out really well - I loved the pepperiness that the turnip greens imparted, and appreciated that it was lighter and healthier than the usual restaurant version. The taste was pretty similar, even though I forgot a few ingredients Next time I will just buy the cheese, make it in advance, or use tofu. But overall it was a winner and I will make it again.
Saturday, November 17, 2012
My brief foray into cougarhood
A few weeks ago I met a French guy on OKCupid. I will call him Mr Cub. He was new to town - a new assistant prof here, and was like a breath of fresh air after this recent batch of OkC guys. He is also 11 years younger than me. For reasons not entirely obvious to me, he was very persistent. I ignored my usual rules of not responding to guys without pictures, who are too persistent in emailing me, and who haven't written much in their profiles. I also ignored my own rule about guys who are too much younger than me - he was on the borderline. Anyway, he was quick to pull the conversation into sexual territory, but it was kind of entertaining and not creepy. We met up for coffee, hit it off really well, and then continued to text/IM a lot. But then reality intervened. Ever move to a new town and start a new job where you have to build a research program from scratch and set up a lab? Well, I have, sort of, and it's exhausting and can eat up every last bit of your time, and then some. So we didn't get together then first weekend afterwards, but I didn't give it too much thought. The intensity with which he tried to seduce me online was the exception to my norm, rather than the slow pace of getting back together after the first meeting. I heard more compliments, flirtation, and endearments in a week than I did in a typical year with T. It was entertaining and was a good counterbalance to the stress of Luna's death. We continued with our texting/IM'ing/sexting. I will spare you the naughty details but it was fun. Since I knew he was busy and had an inkling he might mainly want to just be online chat buddies, I offered him that option early on. But no, he didn't take it and wanted to meet in person again. He was going to come over for dinner last Sunday, but at the last minute he texted me that stuff had gone really badly in lab and he was way behind schedule and was going to have to bail. I didn't text back right away. Eventually I did. He was apologetic - it was one of those situations where once you start things you have to keep going until you are done. I know how that goes and have days like that myself, although I usually try to plan so that it doesn't impact my plans. I was kind of cold at first - not harsh, just didn't write much. After a bit more texting, we were back to normal, or so I thought. But this week the relentless pursuit has ceased, although he is still checking out my online profile frequently. I've texted him a few times and he has seemed normal but very tired. Nonetheless I suspect that my foray into cougarhood was a brief one and this is the start of the fadeaway. I am disappointed but it did do wonders for my self-esteem and provided a lot of entertainment when I needed it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


